Sorry for not putting beak to paper before now, but you know it is these days in the jungle. I don’t get the time to do anything relaxing.  When the wife’s ill and there’s the kids to look after, I don’t get the time. My son demonstrated to me his low flying capabilities which I advise him against using too often. It is surprising how many parrots you hear of these days getting wiped out by low flying. Fellow the other day got caught in a creeper and was strung up like I don’t know what.

I suppose you don’t get much chance to do a spot of flying. Anyway I don’t see much need for you to fly around since you’ve got it all laid on, a nice warm cage, food and water whenever you want. We don’t have such luxuries here.
The main reason I write is to tell you the latest about is happening my area. I said the wife’s been ill, well for a treat for her and the kids (I stopped my son’s low flying antics), I took them to a small spot I once discovered on my travels. It is a nice spot with a large selection of food if I remember rightly. When I arrived had quite a shock. Just before we arrived we stopped for a little rest, and I had a little look on ahead to see if were on right track since it was long time since I was in that area. When I flown a few vines further on, I though I head a strange sort of noise, not one which I had ever heard before. Being an inquisitive sort of bird I ventured even further. Quite a number of vines later on I came to what I believed was one the clearing that I remembered. However, I discovered to be horror and disgust that the humans had transformed it into one of their massive great hard grey things that I had heard about on grapevine. From what I could see, it covered an area thousands of us parrots could live in and it would take several days to travel the length of it. My wondrous clearing had been totally destroyed along what all the food in it. I notice several other parrots around about so I went over and introduced myself.

I don’t really know what this object was supposed to be and the parrots showed me some other humans who apparently were not in favour of this thing. They had sticks and were throwing at this noisy yellow object, that was lurching around the place. Apparently they had once lived there and now they had nowhere to live. Some other people had pieces of wood which they had written “NO BYPASS” on.

Well I don’t know what the world is coming to, really I don’t. I must fly on now.

Regards, Wilberforce.

Arriving a little earlier than in previous years was a bonus; gave a little more quiet time to review what was there and determine a plan of attack. It was noticeable I think that there were a few less exhibitors than in previous years – the noteable absence of Canon for example. It also felt a little less crowded, not so much pushing and shoving to get somewhere. Or perhaps this was just because with fewer stands everything was spaced out more. I also noted sadly there were no public address announcements when a talk was about to start; nor is they any central list of the talks. A real shame as I had hoped to pay more attention here this year.

After a coffee and bacon bap (so important to stay hydrated and feed as it’s a non-stop day)  first stop was as planned Nikon. So D7000 D300S and D700 comparison. My comparison here was purely ergonomic – all are good specifications and all better than a D100! The broad decision was easy to make – I picked p the D7000 and then put it down again. Ergonomically it is just felt ‘wrong’. Comparing with a D300s/D700 body showed quite a lot had been taken off the left hand side. With the grip on the bottom the D7000 became a square box with a lens at the top left corner – not at all balanced.

If I had to buy a camera today – D300s; however it’s coming to the end of its life. D700? well with DX lens this crops down to around the D100. A few more pixels are now required really.  Upshot? Well the money is not quite yet in the account so it’s a wait and see game?  Can I last until the D400 or D800?  D800 full frame is very tempting – lower noise and get to use the old FX lens as they should be used.

Moving to the Lee Filters, ‘Big Stopper’ talking to the Lee stand Speed Graphic decided not to bring any as they would sell out very quickly. (Business model fail?) So Linhof got the order (as they had some but had sold out).

PhotoBox next to talk about their calendars in loci James. Well the couldn’t say what the aspect ratio was, not were overly  keen to find out. But were firmly of the opinion that the templates in the calendar tool would permit the layout that is required without any needing to know the ratio. Plus that the mix of colour/b&w wouldn’t compromise the image quality. In fact the example calendar on display was a mix and had good definition.

Epson’s new printer is big – but not as I had imagined another replacement for the replacement of the R2400; the R2880 still stands. This new printer is filling a new need apparently. They did confirm that servicing a printer that hasn’t physically failed or has demanded servicing is not reqiured. My drifting black point is most likely my colour management.

So what else?

1. Spoke to Joe Cornish and Eddie Ephraums about their new book (signed copy obtained)
2. Paramo have indicated to me to send back my jacket so they can remove the lint it’s picked up over the years (a common problem now especially with merino wool.
3. Brilliant Prints impressed me with their canvas prints, very good quality printing and physical construction. Reasonable prices, good guarentee and a passion for the business which is so important.
4. Drobo always impresses me; especially this year when I got to start pulling out drives live and putting them back again.
5. Last year I was smitten by a new monitor, and so this year. NEC PA-241W is simply outstanding – and one of the lower end models. Maybe if I wait for the D800 I might be tempted with a new monitor.
6. Loxley Colour was also a stop; having been impressed with some prints for Alexis, I wanted to stop buy – they do calendars (yes finally I can get competent calendar!) and lots of other things.
7. Sony had a very impressive stand and display, no doubt trying hard now that a certain big name was missing. Yet not many people around the stand.
8. Panasonic though had a good showing for the Lumix G series. An impressive concept with a growing lens collection. It’s a very tempting proposition I must say. Indeed one I would possibly recommended to anybody starting. (Although it has to be said the D3100 is also very impressive – although so very very small!)

I must give an honorable mention to the vice-president of the RPS – as I challenged him to explain why I should join. I do applaud and support the concept of the awards and have seriously been working on and off to the ‘L’ Panel. Yet reviewing the cost of the RPS  – now at least £100 a year – I need to ask what I would get from it. To be fair the answer is really – how much can you put in…. the problem is that with the amount of time free for photography the RPS would always for me a the moment a distant club. I applaud the work they do behind the scenes… but sorry at the moment £100 is better spent on other areas of photography.

So finally to the end of the day, a quick trip to the Hahnemühle stand for their discount on paper. Also picked up a DIY Canvas kit for £20 – worth a try. Also just looking at their site I realise that I was quizzing one of their top directors about how curl a roll sheet of paper would have when mounted.

Also picked up a new Nomad print box (growing print collection) – these are simple boxes but simply brilliant. Did get a soft sided cases for taking to club print evenings.

I did finally pay another visit to Nikon – was my initial impression right from earlier in the day? Yes – no question. So the matter remains now, need to get the money into the camera fund. When it gets to the suitable level – where are we in the year.

One reason I go is primarily to spend a day with photographers, cameras, gadgets and photographs.  Generally I don’t go with a shopping list – as I know that I’m going to be tempted to get something. Plus to be honest the prices are not that greatly reduced I find.

So what am I looking for this year?

1. D300S or D7000 – need to go and hold these and see really which I want…. money is now there to replace the D100 – it’s getting to the end of it’s life.
2. Lee Filters 10stop filter – will probably buy this there.
3. Attend some of the talks – never really done this before as I’ve always just spent the time wandering around all the stands. But as a lot of these are the same year-on-year time to get to some talks.
4. Look at the new Epson printer that is a several generations away successor to the R2400

Often I’ve been with James but as he’s doing his day job this year I’m going to head over to PhotoBox and find out really what the aspect ratios of the apertures of the calendars are! Plus why the Blacks on mixed colour/monochrome products aren’t black.

Although I can’t promise anything if there’s some burning question you think could only be answered at Focus, post a comment and I’ll see if I get it answered!

Will post back next week.

Optimize performance of Photoshop CS3 on Windows XP and Vista on Adobe’s site gives some basic information; on of the interesting things was having to local hard drives. Currently I have one 160Gb (small now) and a 500Gb NAS (RAID1).

So some thinking on upgrading the PC.

1. Clear out stuff
2. Run more from the NAS
3. 2nd Hard Drive – Shuttle case can take it.. but need to move out the Floppy Drive/Card Reader.

Will edit this as thinking moves on… see Delicious Stream for more links on this topic

It’s worth stating some background to my voting choices. Firstly be born in 1975 meant that as I soon as I could understand anything about government my first Prime Minster became Margaret Thatcher.  So the reality that a another political party could really form a government didn’t become real until 1997 – a few years later.

Also it’s worth noting that I am an ardent ‘fan’ of the series ‘Yes, Prime Minister’ therefore I suspect a certain cynicism is present in my views.

So to my voting choices.  I was hoping that I would get to meet a Conservative Candidate and be able to assure them that I was “voting for a change” (the Conservative motto this election).  Voter apathy is often highlighted, especially amongst the young. This is to me the most concerning feature politics. My Grandmother would always say that people had died for my right to vote.  She would be horrified that people would consider no voting; although I suspect that she would be most horrified that the political parties had yet the voters get to the point where they saw no reason to.

This is one of the central reasons I have always, and will do this time vote for the Member of Parliament who is a member of the Liberal Democrats. They are not one of the two parties that have held government for many, many years. Therefore in order to get change of any sort we need a different government and therefore voting LibDem I believe is the best way of achieving that.

A Warning to the Liberal Democrats – you are a political party the same as Conservative or Labour, therefore I would expect you to have the same motivations. Should after several years of government you have not produced the change in thinking and belief then many people will be disappointed.

Note the phrasing in the paragraph above “vote for the Member of Parliament who is a member of the Liberal Democrats”. Any candidate who asks if they I would vote for them; would get the reply “sorry no I can’t”.  What the current system requires me to do the is vote for a party. In a general election it is interests of the country as a whole I am interested in. Those interests are therefore served by the government, and that under the current electoral system is governed by what party I vote for.

This leads on to why I’m not going to vote Lib Dem in the local election. In this I am voting for a person to represent and look after local issues at a local level. Here, I feel that party politics has less to offer me.  It is true that the same system works for electing the local council as for a government; but I feel that choosing the correct person is more important to represent local issues.

Therefore locally I always vote independent; the local independent candidates have done very well over many years. I see no reason to alter this.

These are my thoughts today; there are some holes in the thinking possibly. I would willing entering into any discussion of policies and principles of the system.


So I apologise for any inconvenience whilst I’ve not been blogging.  So why what write this now?  Well in the interim I’ve actually started using Twitter and been ‘micro-blogging’ for some time. I saw the title of this post on a vending machine. My thought process was – ‘oh I’ll tweet about that when I get back to my desk; but 140 characters can’t sum up my dislike for it’. So I’m here!

Scenario is: at work we have cashless-vending. i.e. we need to ‘charge-up’ a card with money. Stick in your card, cash, and you can now use vending machines/buy lunch at the canteen etc. There aren’t many of these charging machines, and when one was out of order, the nearest is the other side of the site. Ten minutes walk – ok not a big problem but it gets a “grrrr” when all you want is quick coffee before the next meeting.

So what’s my problem? It’s the any in the phrase. It has always implied to me that the author is saying.  “This machine being out of order could possibly in some rare circumstance have caused you inconvenience. Should this unlikely circumstance have arisen then I’m sorry”.

It’s the fact that the any suggests for the most of time you won’t have a problem – but if you do hey, we’re sorry. My argument is that they when this phrase gets the probability is that you have (or will) be inconvenienced. Therefore this phrase just adds “insult to the injury”.

Rarely you do see “Sorry for the inconvenience caused” – which always gives me a better feeling. It’s also a case of writing a phrase that is so often used the author is not actually thinking about what they have said.

Anyway – that feels better now, rant off.  So when will the next post be? 2011? I certainly hope not, but if it does I apologise for the inconvenience I will have caused you.

The weather was wonderful, and the site is in amazing small piece of oak woodland. Absolutely English!! Together with the wittle and daube buildings it is a very impressive place. After a while you really start to forget that it’s 2007. The civil war siege of Portsmouth was occurring this week in 1642; one thing that struck home is that 1642 what we now think of as being close wasn’t then. Scale was very different.

Wonderful people with great stories to tell of life and living. Narrowly missed being signed up to be a Pikeman.. best job for a gentleman apparently. Attention to detail is amazing – sausages in the chimney to smoke and kill the maggots.

My knowledge of 1642 is a bit rusty – better brush up for next time as well. Sadly some of my photo knowledge left me as well and the VR lens didn’t perform as well as I had hoped it would do.

In the words of Bill Bryson “Go; go now”…. (though I’d like to keep my car if you don’t mind… plus it didn’t exist in 1642 anyway)

Wheelwright, originally uploaded by Calanais.

I love the D100 – wonderful build quality and I’ve really got some good use from it.  The D300 has some great advances over the D200. Noteably to me are 100% viewfinder, 12MP, auto focus that is way superior that the D100.  UDMA CF cards, and HDMI video out could be useful.

Plus it has built in sensor cleaning… yes excellent.

Having just got some new lens and filters; no way will I be able to get a D300.. so perhaps Christmas 2009?

50 people experience the seasons, originally uploaded by flipzagging.

An absolutley stunning set of images – they are produced by combining 50 different pictures that represent the same topic. The texture of the photos is quite stunning.  What I really like about these is that colours of the seasons really stand out well.

Well worth checking out!

• 1 in 4
• 25%
• A quarter
• 2 out of  8

Now they all quote the same proportion; my assertion is that whilst these are the same amount, that saying “a quarter of people” gives a different ‘feel’ from “1 in 4 people”.

Assuming this assertion holds, the problem that I have is when 2 statistics are mixed together. For example (and this is the real example I heard today).

A quarter of students achieved grade A in A-level exams, compared with 1 in 10 a few years ago.

By using the x in y approach for figure a few years ago and using “a quarter” now I think exaggerates the difference between the amounts. Say we recast the sentance,

 25percent of students achieved grade A in A-level exams, compared with 10percent a few years ago.

Does that change the perceived difference? I think it does – please contradict me!!